You only have to look at how Twitter users embraced the it’s all Nick Clegg’s fault hashtag #nickcleggsfault to see how Twitter can be used, imaginatively and speedily, by tweeters to create a voice for themselves. By using humour tweeters responded to and highlighted the ridiculous in the right wing media coverage attacking the Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg. More on this...
Twitter is growing at gigantic rate, experiencing 1,500% growth in the last year (for more stats see The State and Future of Twitter 2010). For those who are not converts it does seem to be the latest in a line of social media tools that everyone thinks you should be using.
But what is in it for campaigners trying to bring about social change? Below sets out three main ways in which campaigners have already been using Twitter in their work to get you thinking and there are also three great examples to illustrate. Please add any experiences or thoughts of your own.
1. To find things…… people, info, intelligence that you probably otherwise would not be able to find or afford to pay for
One of the great things about twitter is how it can be utilised to find people, advice, and insider knowledge that many of us would otherwise not be able to access or afford to pay for. You could use it to find people in your local area interested in your issue or with a specific skill, or tap into feelings of discontent with a certain topical issue, contacting potential new supporters directly.
Children’s Food Campaign, Coco Pops and Twitter
Children's Food Campaign is part of Sustain an alliance for better food and farming, they campaign on a range of issues to enhance the health and welfare of people and animals. In a recent campaign the Children's Food Campaign tapped into widespread anger felt by lots of parents to an advert by ” by Kellogg’s (a partner in the governments Change4 Life health campaign) for Cocopops which suggested to children “Ever thought of Coco Pops after school. Cocopops are deemed too unhealthy to be advertised on children’s TV and banned from school and the poster featured the Coco Pop monkey in a school uniform. Children's Food Campaign utilised the power of twitter and search there to find people talking about the issue and contact them directly with details on the campaign and direct them to a campaign action. They found twitter particularly helpful in reaching out to a new group of potential supporters. As well as encouraging supporters to write directly to Kellogg’s Sustain also ran a fun and inventive competition for supporters to get involved and compose their own slogan for the advert. See http://www.sustainweb.org/childrensfoodcampaign/coco_pops/ Campaign Co-coordinator Jackie Schneider says
“As soon as the bus stop adverts appeared several of our supporters contacted us to complain so we knew the ads were not popular. I looked on twitter and searched the term coco pops ads and found lots of tweets from people who had passed the ads that day and wanted to comment on their inappropriateness. It was easy to follow those people and send them a message about our coco pops slogan campaign. We found that one concerned individual had already tweeted the address of Kellogg's CSR person. Using twitter allowed us to find people who were concerned about the same issues we were so we could alert them to our work. Many of them signed up to The Children's Food Campaign as a result and went on to tweet links to us. My advice would be to act fast. Twitter is a very immediate medium and things move on quickly. We were able to show the tweets to a journalists to persuade him it wasn't just us complaining. This led to a piece in a national newspaper.’
For the possibilities of this see the Campaign for Better Food example down the page.”
2. To act as an intermediary platform to find supporters and guide people to take action
As with all social media tools Twitter does pose some of the same limitations around converting awareness of an issue into action. But it seems that the way Twitter is used by its members, to send links to webpages, news stories or pictures, does make it much more conducive to linking to ‘offsite’ actions than most other social media platforms.
Campaigners are already using twitter as an intermediary, to guide people who have shown an interest in your work, towards the ‘next step’ of involvement in your campaign. You can easily link Tweets to e-petitions, letter-writing actions and online surveys, with greater uptake than you would likely get from posting outside actions to a Facebook group, or a blog, as that is how people more people use twitter.
64 for Suu.org
Rapidly responding to the imprisonment and trial of Aung San Suu Kyi for 'breaking the terms of her illegal house arrest’ a campaigning coalition, consisting of amongst others Avaaz, Amnesty International and Burma Campaigning UK came together.
64 for Suu aimed to raise awareness of her situation and gather messages of support for Aung San Suu Kyi, ahead of her 64th birthday. Within six days they managed to pull together a campaign website which successfully integrated social media platforms, allowing it to display all the messages of support on the site. For more learning on the how they did this see FairSay’s write up here.
Utilising social media allowed the campaign to reach a wide audience of potential supporters in a very short space of time. In just a few weeks they had gathered over 18,000 messages of support – videos, tweets, photos or texts.
On twitter the organisations in the coalition used the hashtags #64forsuu and #assk64 with their campaign messages. Grouping messages of support with a hashtag allowed any shows of support could be captured and appear on the 64 for Suu.org website automatically without people ever having to visit it and upload it themselves. This can easily be done through a Twitterfall http://www.twitterfall.com/ which streams tweets directly to you.
For more on the campaign see http://64forsuu.org/ or to see the tweets http://twitter.com/64forsuu
3. As a platform for leaderless campaigning
One of the largest implications for campaigners is that Twitter can provide a ‘leaderless’ platform for ideas and messages to develop collaboratively amongst mass numbers of people, without formal coordination or leadership. Popular key words and phrases (or ‘hashtags’) allow millions of people to connect, based on their views on a current event or issue. One powerful example of this is the Trafigura ‘campaign’, in which public outrage, channelled through Twitter, led to the over-turning of the first gag order of public reporting of Parliament in 400 years, 12 hours after it happened. What it demonstrates is the potential for groups, via the internet, to achieve change on their own, without a traditional organisation to coordinate strategy or actions.
Trafigura example
At 8:30pm, on Monday, October 12th, 2009, PR firm, Carter-Ruck secured the first gag order against the reporting of Parliament in 400 years, against the Guardian newspaper and a tabled Parliamentary Question about their client, oil trading firm Trafigura. The firm was under investigation for the alleged dumping of toxic waste, in the Ivory Coast, leading to a range of health problems for local residents. As a British company, Parliament was looking at the validity of these allegations and if legal action would be required.
That same evening, news of the gag order had reached the internet – initially via Twitter – but soon boiling over into blog posts, news stories and spontaneous, protest actions, initiated by members of the many-thousands’ strong self-organised online community.
By the morning of the 13th, two of the country’s leading political blogs, and print magazine, Private Eye, had published the full-text of the gagged Parliamentary Question, as well as a wealth of background reporting on Trafigura’s practices in the Ivory Coast. Before 2:00pm, on the 13th, Carter-Ruck had withdrawn the so-called ‘super-injunction’, under public and Parliamentary pressure, generated largely through the internet.
It’d be really interesting to hear how campaign organisations are thinking about and responding to these types of situations and what roles they can and want to play in campaigns that emerge independently of them. Depending on how campaigning organisations position themselves to these developments twitter can be seen as either a major threat or opportunity, key will be how comfortable an organisation feels being ‘part of a movement’, rather than the ‘control centre’ of a campaign. This could involve a shift from previous campaigns, that organisations will need to begin thinking about and experimenting with. It could involve supporting and being involved in a campaign in different ways - whether offering a meeting space for the independent activists involved, making introductions to key decision makers, or helping promote the relevant work of others attached to the cause
Implications for the future of membership…
Closely linked to this issue a joint project the Future of Membership run by NCVO Third Sector Foresight, RSA with a coalition of leading membership organisations have started to look at what the future holds for membership organisations. The project has identified six key drivers that could play a key role over the next five years which are
- Changing sources of identity
- Changing attitudes to money and consumerism
- Increasing availability of free information
- The rise of the social web
- Changing expectations of participation
- The commodification of membership
For more info on these issues and to assess how your organisation is preparing you can download the free Future Focus pdf What will membership be like in 5 years' time and for more on the project see http://www.3s4.org.uk/drivers/categories/membership
Twitter profiles
Here is a quick summary of some interesting conversations had on the incredibly useful ecampaigning-forum around multiple organisational staff twitter accounts
There are many ways to coordinate work based twitter accounts
- an organisational account
- and or a campaigns team account
- as well or just staff accounts who tweet in their own names and re-tweet the good ones from the main account where appropriative.
Having both an organisational/official campaigns team account as well as individual staff accounts can help increase the reach of messages, s well as showing that there is organisational wide support and knowledge of a campaign or issue – which can only really enhance your work. One of the easiest ways to insure that there is a distinction between what is the organisational account and therefore ‘the official line’ and staff accounts is to get staff account to state a disclaimer - that these are my own personal opinions not necessarily those of my organisation. That way staff members are free to tweet about issues and actions themselves, and personalise their messages as they want. Staff accounts can of course also retweet anything important coming from the main organisational account.
To help organise all these twitter accounts and enable other followers to find people you can also group staff accounts in a list like this one from Amnesty
http://twitter.com/AmnestyUK/amnesty-uk
Or help coordinate and link up local groups the same way
http://twitter.com/AmnestyUK/amnesty-groups
Be interesting to hear what else has been working well….
Twitter general summary
Pros
- Speed of communication
- ‘Digestible’ format, that encourages broader participation
- Opportunity for supporter/beneficiary feedback and dialogue
- Conduit to connect with other campaign platforms
- Single established platform of its type, thus no concern of an audience split between competing platforms (i.e. – Facebook and LinkdIn and Bebo)
- Can create a less-centralised, and thus, less-resource intensive model of campaigning to develop
Cons
- High competition for peoples’ time/attention
- Individual ‘tweets’ can be missed by most recipients
- Often less effective without understanding of ‘Twitter Etiquette’, especially if used as a broadcast (rather than conversational) medium
- Message may outgrow your organisation’s campaign objectives, capacity, or remit, taking on a ‘collective life of its own’, which your organisation can no longer ‘control’
- User-base (though growing incredibly quickly) is still not reflective of the broader population
Want to know more – comprehensive guide from DigiActive.org
Guide to Twitter for Activism http://www.digiactive.org/2009/04/13/twitter_guide/
Getting started..
There’s loads of useful helpers out there here are just a few
http://socialmedia-strategy.wikispaces.com/Sign+up+for+Twitter+and+follow+5+nonprofit+folks
http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2008/05/talk-twitter-to.html
http://www.technicavita.org/social-advice/twitter/what-is-twitter-a-short-guide-for-charity.html
Big thanks goes to Jackie Schneider, Rachel Collinson and the wise words of Liam Barrington-Bush